• Science & Other Forms of Knowledge

    By

    Abstract: This paper argues that scientism—the view that science is the only source of factual knowledge—is both false and self-defeating. Drawing on counterexamples from literary theory, history, and the axioms of mathematics and logic, the paper demonstrates that non-scientific knowledge exists. A formal logical proof shows that scientism is inconsistent with this fact. Furthermore, scientism fails its own criterion: the thesis that all knowledge must be scientifically justified cannot itself be scientifically justified, rendering it self-referentially incoherent and rationally unacceptable.

  • Abstract: Popular cosmology often claims that quantum physics explains how the universe arose from “nothing.” This essay examines that claim in the work of Alexander Vilenkin and Lawrence Krauss, showing that the “nothing” invoked is not absolute nonbeing but a physically and mathematically specified state—governed by quantum laws, configuration spaces, and boundary conditions. The Borde–Guth–Vilenkin theorem further complicates matters by implying past-incompleteness for inflationary spacetimes. Physics can describe state transitions within a law-like framework; it cannot derive existence from genuine nothingness.

  • 2011: The Year I Turned Back to God

    By

    This short and informal essay briefly traces my journey from atheism, back to Christian theism. Central to this reconsideration are four interconnected problems: the irreducibility of consciousness, the difficulty of grounding rationality within a purely evolutionary framework, the persistent appearance of objective moral facts, and the question of ultimate meaning.

  • Abstract: This essay engages the strongest egalitarian objections to the complementarian reading of Paul’s teaching on women in the church. Each objection—including the Ephesian context argument, the lexical dispute over αὐθεντεῖν, the prophecy-preaching equivalence claim, and the hermeneutical consistency challenge—is stated with full charitable force before receiving a considered reply. The essay concludes that the interpretive weight falls on Paul’s Genesis-grounded rationale in 1 Timothy 2, while conceding points that guard against caricature and misuse of these texts.

  • Abstract: This essay argues that Paul neither silences women in the church nor permits undifferentiated access to all teaching roles. Through careful exegesis of 1 Corinthians 11, 1 Corinthians 14, and 1 Timothy 2:11–15—attending to Greek terminology and literary context—the essay demonstrates that Paul assumes women pray and prophesy in the assembly while restricting the authoritative teaching office to qualified men. Crucially, Paul grounds this restriction not in local custom but in creation order (Genesis 2–3), distinguishing culturally variable symbols from abiding structural principles.

  • Abstract: In 1960, Eugene Wigner identified a puzzle that remains unresolved: why does mathematics—often developed for purely aesthetic or internal reasons—describe physical reality with such extraordinary precision? This essay examines the historical emergence of mathematical physics, surveys philosophical positions on mathematics’ nature, and presents richly detailed examples from classical mechanics through quantum field theory and the Standard Model. Proposed resolutions—anthropic selection, evolutionary epistemology, structural realism—are critically evaluated and found wanting. The effectiveness of mathematics in natural science remains a brute explanandum, pointing toward something fundamental about existence that we do not…

  • Abstract: The claim that women contributed nothing to the Bible trades on historical ignorance regarding ancient literacy and authorship. Evidence for female literacy in antiquity is scarce but not absent—Athenian vases depict literate women, and cuneiform colophons attest to female scribes. More significantly, ancient authorship involved multiple stages from oral composition to scribal preservation; the relevant question is not merely “Who held the pen?” but “Whose words are preserved?” The biblical text preserves identifiable contributions from women, including Miriam’s Song of the Sea and the maternal instruction of Proverbs 31.

  • Abstract: This paper clarifies the biological status of the human embryo and distinguishes that question from philosophical debates about personhood. It argues that, on standard biological taxonomy, a fertilised human egg is a whole, living Homo sapiens organism at the zygotic stage, and that denying this confuses biological classification with moral or theological claims. It then outlines Catholic teaching on contraception, grounding it in the structure and ends of the conjugal act (Casti connubii), and assesses the relevance of Genesis 38 (Onan) to that doctrine.

  • Abstract: This paper considers the “twinning problem” for the identity-over-time argument against abortion. The objection claims that if monozygotic twins arise from one zygote, numerical identity would make each twin identical to the original zygote, contradicting transitivity. The paper argues that the naïve “one becomes two” picture is logically impossible. It defends a fission-with-termination model: in twinning, the original organism ceases to exist at division and two new organisms begin. The argument’s moral conclusion is preserved with refined label-tracking conditions.

  • Abstract: This paper defends the identity-over-time argument against abortion by answering two objections. First, it rebuts the material replacement worry (a biological sort Ship of Theseus) by distinguishing numerical identity from mere equivalence and by appealing to time-indexed properties to explain persistence through metabolic turnover and development. Second, it addresses personhood-based criteria by distinguishing biological humanity from personhood and arguing that being human is sufficient for personhood within a broader normative category that may include non-human persons.

  • Abstract: This paper addresses two common objections to the identity-over-time argument against abortion. First, it clarifies the claim that killing is prima facie wrong by noting recognised exceptions (e.g., self-defence) and explaining how Aquinas’ principle of double effect may apply in life-saving pregnancy complications such as ectopic pregnancy. Second, it distinguishes qualitative from numerical identity: embryos and adults differ in properties yet can be the same persisting individual.

  • Abortion & Identity Over Time

    By

    Abstract: This paper argues against abortion by appealing to numerical identity over time. The organism that exists as a zygote or embryo is numerically identical to the later adult, despite extensive qualitative change. If killing is prima facie wrong because it deprives an individual of a future like ours, then destroying a zygote or embryo deprives the same individual of that future at an earlier stage. Therefore, abortion is prima facie immoral.